Closet TeaBagger
I am a firm believer in the saying , Man seeks pleasure, not pain. In my opinion, that saying is closely akin to the negative and positives of another saying, walk a mile in my shoes.
I posit on January 19th, the closet TeaBagger was seeking pleasure voting for the future Sen. Scott Brown (R-MASS). The TeaBagger may have been a registered Democrat, Independent or Republican but he was seeking pleasure. He saw a man with whom he could identify. And just as the pleasure seeker voting against Mr. Brown during the January elections, there was today a pleasure seeker chiding him for voting against a Republican filibuster to the Job’s Bill. Pleasure seekers all.
It is my observation there are units of TeaBaggers scattered around the country with each group seeking a candidate to support and vote for. The candidate that gives them pleasure, if you will. The various groups will entertain the candidate and conduct auditions. They will be polite when the candidate speaks -sometimes- and put out their best pleasure sensors for all to see. I believe they are doing the dirty work for a lot of us and they are as suspicious of the media as the rest of us. Still, they give the candidate a chance to “Strut his stuff!” Do his thing, if you will. I personally would not have the patience.
However, what appears to be the TeaBagger’s Achilles heal is a group of “pleasure seekers” who feel duty-bound hanging negative ornaments on their tree. It appears whenever a Republican is working in the negatives of our society, the media calls him a TeaBagger. I refute the assumptions and find them offensive, manipulative and polarizing. If a TeaBagger group identifies a candidate with whom I also find pleasure, that candidate will get my vote and I will give a hat-tip to the TeaBaggers. I think the media wish they would all go away! I think the media is threatened by the movement and for good reasons.
Finally, in my opinion, TeaBaggers are not die-hard voters who are slaves to voting for one party against their pleasure syndromes. That's why I say some TeaBaggers are in the closet. The January vote for Scott Brown proves that. I remain optimistic observing the TeaBagger’s movement knowing they are just as subject to human frailties as I am while seeking pleasures in my life. As a matter of fact, I am looking forward to seeing the person they support in 2010 and 2012. I am encourage with the straw poll taken the other day wherein Mitt Romney won 39% of the votes and Sarah Palin got 7%. Media pundits say it is due to the fact she was not at the conference. The inference is hysterical! LMBAO!
Fighting for the dignity of my Ancestors,
God bless Bill Gates. WPFW, C-SPAN and the spirits of the unborn for the help,
BB
I posit on January 19th, the closet TeaBagger was seeking pleasure voting for the future Sen. Scott Brown (R-MASS). The TeaBagger may have been a registered Democrat, Independent or Republican but he was seeking pleasure. He saw a man with whom he could identify. And just as the pleasure seeker voting against Mr. Brown during the January elections, there was today a pleasure seeker chiding him for voting against a Republican filibuster to the Job’s Bill. Pleasure seekers all.
It is my observation there are units of TeaBaggers scattered around the country with each group seeking a candidate to support and vote for. The candidate that gives them pleasure, if you will. The various groups will entertain the candidate and conduct auditions. They will be polite when the candidate speaks -sometimes- and put out their best pleasure sensors for all to see. I believe they are doing the dirty work for a lot of us and they are as suspicious of the media as the rest of us. Still, they give the candidate a chance to “Strut his stuff!” Do his thing, if you will. I personally would not have the patience.
However, what appears to be the TeaBagger’s Achilles heal is a group of “pleasure seekers” who feel duty-bound hanging negative ornaments on their tree. It appears whenever a Republican is working in the negatives of our society, the media calls him a TeaBagger. I refute the assumptions and find them offensive, manipulative and polarizing. If a TeaBagger group identifies a candidate with whom I also find pleasure, that candidate will get my vote and I will give a hat-tip to the TeaBaggers. I think the media wish they would all go away! I think the media is threatened by the movement and for good reasons.
Finally, in my opinion, TeaBaggers are not die-hard voters who are slaves to voting for one party against their pleasure syndromes. That's why I say some TeaBaggers are in the closet. The January vote for Scott Brown proves that. I remain optimistic observing the TeaBagger’s movement knowing they are just as subject to human frailties as I am while seeking pleasures in my life. As a matter of fact, I am looking forward to seeing the person they support in 2010 and 2012. I am encourage with the straw poll taken the other day wherein Mitt Romney won 39% of the votes and Sarah Palin got 7%. Media pundits say it is due to the fact she was not at the conference. The inference is hysterical! LMBAO!
Fighting for the dignity of my Ancestors,
God bless Bill Gates. WPFW, C-SPAN and the spirits of the unborn for the help,
BB
posted by BB at 4:56 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home