Three peas in a pod and a PR malfunction
The three peas in a genetically engineered pod are *Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid and Arlen Specter. All losers!
Seeing their hustle with strong and calculated struggles to become relevant is a top-drawer embarrassment. In my opinion, seeing the three of them exploding on our television screens could only be the work of a public relations (PR) agency. The three of them must have gotten a good deal from the PR firm. I hope they think the fees were worth the exposure. Seem PR firms are not discrimination, bless their hearts.
If that is indeed the case, the fallacy is the public has a short memory and they jumped out here too soon. The blatant lie we have short memories has been perpetuated for eons by our mainstream media. Not so with bloggers. We have loooong memories as proven time and time again and we will continue to give mainstream media a run for its (dwindling) money for free. Pelosi, Reid and Specter are losers and they have got to go in the nearest primary that could not come soon enough for me.
Ms. Pelosi has to grow accustomed to the fact she missed her calling to reach heroine status to which she apparently strives. With sober and calculated considerations, “Impeachment is off the table” she so arrogantly pronounced. Those hero and heroine moments rarely come more than once in a politician’s life time. Ms. Pelosi herself drove the first nail in her own coffin which is indeed a rarity amongst thinking people in her position! (Don’t you get started, Blood Pressure. Down, boy!)
As always,
BB
*Excerpt:
Pelosi's maneuver has been to be the president's loyalist, or, as seems more and more accurate, his lap-dog. She's the most goo-goo eyed Democrat in Washington, or at least playing that role. The Senate, and its leader Harry Reid, seem to be positioning themselves more critically, or churlishly.
Michael Wolff
Author of Newser.com's Off the Grid blog
Posted February 12, 2009 | 11:00 AM (EST) BIO Become a Fan Get Email Alerts Bloggers' Index
Can Nancy Pelosi Be Tom DeLay?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-wolff/can-nancy-pelosi-be-tom-d_b_166361.html
Seeing their hustle with strong and calculated struggles to become relevant is a top-drawer embarrassment. In my opinion, seeing the three of them exploding on our television screens could only be the work of a public relations (PR) agency. The three of them must have gotten a good deal from the PR firm. I hope they think the fees were worth the exposure. Seem PR firms are not discrimination, bless their hearts.
If that is indeed the case, the fallacy is the public has a short memory and they jumped out here too soon. The blatant lie we have short memories has been perpetuated for eons by our mainstream media. Not so with bloggers. We have loooong memories as proven time and time again and we will continue to give mainstream media a run for its (dwindling) money for free. Pelosi, Reid and Specter are losers and they have got to go in the nearest primary that could not come soon enough for me.
Ms. Pelosi has to grow accustomed to the fact she missed her calling to reach heroine status to which she apparently strives. With sober and calculated considerations, “Impeachment is off the table” she so arrogantly pronounced. Those hero and heroine moments rarely come more than once in a politician’s life time. Ms. Pelosi herself drove the first nail in her own coffin which is indeed a rarity amongst thinking people in her position! (Don’t you get started, Blood Pressure. Down, boy!)
As always,
BB
*Excerpt:
Pelosi's maneuver has been to be the president's loyalist, or, as seems more and more accurate, his lap-dog. She's the most goo-goo eyed Democrat in Washington, or at least playing that role. The Senate, and its leader Harry Reid, seem to be positioning themselves more critically, or churlishly.
Michael Wolff
Author of Newser.com's Off the Grid blog
Posted February 12, 2009 | 11:00 AM (EST) BIO Become a Fan Get Email Alerts Bloggers' Index
Can Nancy Pelosi Be Tom DeLay?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michael-wolff/can-nancy-pelosi-be-tom-d_b_166361.html
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home